ArticleHistochemistry1993
Multicolour preparations for in situ hybridization using precipitating enzyme cytochemistry in combination with reflection contrast microscopy.
Article in Histochemistry, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hematopoietic progenitor cells residing in muscle engraft into bone marrow following transplantation.International journal of hematology · 2004Article
- Cytochemical detection systems for in situ hybridization, and the combination with immunocytochemistry, 'who is still afraid of red, green and blue?'.The Histochemical journal · 1995Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have further developed a method for the detection of different enzyme cytochemical reaction products by means of reflection contrast microscopy (RCM). By embedding these enzyme precipitates in a protein matrix, we were able to prevent the reaction products from dissolving in immersion oil, which is required for RCM analysis. The applicability of the RCM procedure is, therefore, extended to a range of cytochemical enzyme precipitation methods, which normally result in oil soluble reaction products. To test their usefulness, these enzyme precipitates have been used in single- and well as double-label in situ hybridization (ISH) procedures to visualize a number of DNA target sequences by several different reflection colours, i.e. white, yellow and red. Three repetitive DNA probes for the (sub)centromeric regions of chromosomes 1, 7 and 17, as well as a repetitive DNA probe for the telomeric region of chromosome 1, and two cosmid DNA probes (40 kb each) for both arms of chromosome 11 could be detected with high efficiency in both interphase and metaphase preparations. Moreover the enzyme precipitates were shown to be stable upon exposure to excitation light or upon storage. It may be concluded that these findings render RCM a sensitive method for the visualization of multiple targets in biological specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.