Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8305838›Full record

ReviewThe Clinical investigator1993

Mediation of immune glomerular injury.

W G Couser

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Clinical investigator, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

W G CouserDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Seattle University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although glomerular disease remains the most common cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide, major advances have been made recently in understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms which mediate these disorders. Nephrotic syndrome in non inflammatory lesions such as minimal-change/focal sclerosis and MN results from disorders of the GEC which can be simulated in animal models by antibodies to various GEC membrane epitopes. Clarification of how these antibodies effect the GEC to induce a loss of glomerular barrier function should substantially improve understanding of the pathogenesis of minimal change/focal sclerosis. In MN, proteinuria is mediated primarily by C5b-9 through similar mechanisms that also involve the GEC as a target. Inflammatory glomerular lesions are induced by circulating inflammatory cells or proliferating resident glomerular cells. Understanding of how these cells induce tissue injury has also evolved considerably over the past decade. Neutrophil-induced disease involves leukocyte adhesion molecules in regulating neutrophil localization; proteases, oxidants, and myeloperoxidase in mediating injury and platelets in augmenting these processes. The activated mesangial cell exhibits altered phenotype and proliferation with release of oxidants and proteases. Mesangial cell proliferation may be initiated by basic fibroblast growth factor and is maintained by an autocrine mechanism involving PDGF. TGF-beta is important in the subsequent development of sclerosis. As understanding of these areas evolves, numerous new therapeutic strategies can now be devised, including agents which block or inhibit complement effects, oxidants, proteases, growth factors, and other cytokines. Appreciation of the role of several natural inhibitors of these mechanisms may also allow therapeutic manipulations that upregulate regulatory proteins, with a consequent therapeutic benefit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, MembranousGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalHumans

Identifiers

PMID8305838
OpenAlexW3190821537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.