Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8290575›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994

Evidence for RNA editing in mitochondria of all major groups of land plants except the Bryophyta.

R Hiesel, B Combettes, A Brennicke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Plant organellar RNA maturation.The Plant cell · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterization and Analysis of the Mitochondrial Genome of Common Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Characteristics and prediction of RNA editing sites in transcripts of the Moss Takakia lepidozioides chloroplast.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2008
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R HieselInstitut für Genbiologische Forschung, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.
B Combettes
A Brennicke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA editing has been documented in mitochondria of higher plants, notably dicots and monocots. To determine the distribution of mitochondrial RNA editing in the plant kingdom, we have now undertaken a survey of evolutionarily distant plants. RNA editing occurs in all major groups of land plants except the Bryophyta, suggesting that this process is an ancient trait that was established before the radiation of kormophyte plants. No editing is observed in representatives of the green algae, suggesting that editing arose in early land plants after the split of the Bryophyta or has been lost selectively in both algae and mosses. In ferns several U-->C changes are observed, one of which eliminates a genomically encoded UAA termination codon and creates a functional open reading frame.

Indexed as

RNA EditingBase SequenceBiological EvolutionChlorophytaDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersMitochondriaMolecular Sequence DataPlantsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityDNA, ComplementaryDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID8290575
PMCPMC43002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.