ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences1994
Trophic effects of neurotensin in massive bowel resection in the rat.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential protein expression during colonic adaptation in ultra-short bowel rats.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Article
- Novel agents in the treatment of intestinal failure: humoral factors.Gastroenterology · 2006Review
- Intestinal adaptation after massive intestinal resection.Postgraduate medical journal · 2005Review
- Effect of aging on the adaptive and proliferative capacity of the small bowel.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2003Article
- Somatostatin antagonism prevents elemental diet-induced intestinal atrophy in the rat.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2001Article
- Article
- Epidermal growth factor and neurotensin induce microvillus hypertrophy following massive enterectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary TractArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trophic effect of the administration of exogenous neurotensin on the intestinal mucosa was studied in rats following an 80% bowel resection. Villus length and mucosal DNA content were assessed in the jejunal and ileal mucosa of the remnant intestine 14 days after resection. The data obtained in an 80% resected control group (80% group) and an experimental group receiving an infusion of neurotensin (300 micrograms/kg/day) for 14 days subcutaneously (80% + NT group) were compared. The results indicate that the administration of exogenous neurotensin (80% + NT) increases villus length (jejunum: 920 +/- 77 vs 861 +/- 25 microns and ileum length: 975 +/- 23 vs 875 +/- 99 microns) to an extent greater than that observed in the 80% resected group not receiving exogenous neurotensin. The levels of mucosal DNA per milligram of protein increased significantly in both groups but was paradoxically less in the 80% + NT group than in the 80% resection group (jejunum: 8.12 +/- 0.56 vs 10.18 +/- 0.80; ileum: 8.63 +/- 0.43 vs 10.05 +/- 0.46). These data suggest that the administration of exogenous neurotensin to the rat potentiates the growth of intestinal villi and accelerates the intestinal trophic response seen following massive bowel resection. The increase in circulating enteroglucagon levels noted after neurotensin administration (80% + NT: 547 +/- 48 pg/ml vs 80%: 341 +/- 41 pg/ml) suggests that some of the trophic effects of neurotensin may be mediated, at least in part, by enteroglucagon. These data also suggest a potential role for the use of neurotensin in the initial treatment of individuals with short bowel syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.