Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8279465›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1994

The Human Genome Project and eugenic concerns.

K L Garver, B Garver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The New Precision Stewards?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Preventing discrimination based on psychiatric risk biomarkers.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2019
    Review
  4. The power of heredity and the relevance of eugenic history.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Race hygiene in Nazi Germany.American journal of human genetics · 1995
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Evolving Genome Project: current and future impact.American journal of human genetics · 1994
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K L GarverDepartment of Medical Genetics, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh 15224.
B Garver

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. Human Genome project is the largest scientific project funded by the federal government since the Apollo Moon Project. The overall effect from this project should be of great benefit to humankind because it will provide a better understanding both of single gene defects and multifactorial or familial diseases such as diabetes, arteriosclerosis, and cancer. At first this will lead to more exact ways of screening and diagnosing genetic disease, and later it will lead, in many if not most instances, to specific genetic cures. However, in the past, in both the U.S. and German eugenic movements genetic information has been misused. Hopefully, by remembering and understanding the past injustices and inhumanity of negative eugenics, further misuse of scientific information can be avoided.

Indexed as

EugenicsHuman Genome ProjectEthical TheoryGenetic DeterminismGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetics, BehavioralHumansInternationalityNational SocialismPersonal AutonomyRisk AssessmentVulnerable PopulationsGenetics and ReproductionHuman Genome ProjectTwentieth Century

Identifiers

PMID8279465
PMCPMC1918077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.