Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8278412›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994

Construction of libraries enriched for sequence repeats and jumping clones, and hybridization selection for region-specific markers.

R P Kandpal, G Kandpal, S M Weissman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Capturing Darwin's dream.Molecular ecology resources · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R P KandpalDepartment of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
G Kandpal
S M Weissman

Funding

HUMAN EAR-SPECIFIC CDNAS AND X-LINKED DEAFNESS GENESR29DC001682 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KANDPAL, RAJ P. · 1992 to 1996
–
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF CANCERR35CA042556 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WEISSMAN, SHERMAN MORTON · 1986 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA42556NIDCD NIH HHS DC01682-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a simple and rapid method for constructing small-insert genomic libraries highly enriched for dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric nucleotide repeat motifs. The approach involves use of DNA inserts recovered by PCR amplification of a small-insert sonicated genomic phage library or by a single-primer PCR amplification of Mbo I-digested and adaptor-ligated genomic DNA. The genomic DNA inserts are heat denatured and hybridized to a biotinylated oligonucleotide. The biotinylated hybrids are retained on a Vectrex-avidin matrix and eluted specifically. The eluate is PCR amplified and cloned. More than 90% of the clones in a library enriched for (CA)n microsatellites with this approach contained clones with inserts containing CA repeats. We have also used this protocol for enrichment of (CAG)n and (AGAT)n sequence repeats and for Not I jumping clones. We have used the enriched libraries with an adaptation of the cDNA selection method to enrich for repeat motifs encoded in yeast artificial chromosomes.

Indexed as

Genomic LibraryRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidBase SequenceChromatography, AffinityChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, YeastHumansMolecular Sequence DataOligodeoxyribonucleotidesX ChromosomeOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID8278412
PMCPMC42891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.