Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8272385›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1993

Cultured retinal pigment epithelial cells from RCS rats express an increased calcium conductance compared with cells from non-dystrophic rats.

O Strauss, M Wienrich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

O StraussBattelle-Institute e. V., Department of Neurobiology, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
M Wienrich
Battelle-Institut ev · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Royal College of Surgeon (RCS) rats suffer from a retinal dystrophy that is caused by a malfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). We compared the membrane currents of cultured RPE cells from non-dystrophic and RCS rats by using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. Cultured RPE cells from RCS rats showed voltage-dependent, barium- and 4-aminopyridine-sensitive outward currents, which had characteristics of the delayed-rectifier and voltage-dependent, barium- and 4-aminopyridine-sensitive inward currents, which had characteristics of the inward rectifier. Differences between RPE cells from RCS rats and normal rats were as follows. (a) Cultured RCS rat RPE cells showed a resting potential and an activation threshold for the voltage-dependent outward current significantly more positive than that found in cells from non-dystrophic rats. (b) In the presence of 10 mM barium, the voltage-dependent outward current was reduced in both types of cells; in cells from RCS rats, an additional voltage-dependent inward current was observed. (c) This additional inward current had characteristics of L-type calcium channels and was reduced by verapamil (30 microM) and diltiazem (30 microM). In summary, we conclude that the membrane conductances of RPE cells from normal and RCS rats are dominated by potassium conductances. In contrast to cells from non-dystrophic rats, cells of RCS rats expressed an increased membrane conductance for calcium.

Indexed as

4-AminopyridineAnimalsBariumCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCell MembraneCells, CulturedElectric ConductivityPigment Epithelium of EyePotassium Channel BlockersPotassium ChannelsRatsRats, Mutant StrainsRetinal Degeneration4-AminopyridineBariumCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersPotassium Channel BlockersPotassium Channels

Identifiers

PMID8272385
OpenAlexW1967527637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.