Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8246900›Full record

ArticleMolecular & general genetics : MGG1993

In vivo species specificity of DNA polymerase alpha.

S Francesconi, W C Copeland, T S Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & general genetics : MGG, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S FrancesconiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305.
W C Copeland
T S Wang
Stanford University · US

Funding

TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009151 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLEARY, MICHAEL L · 1985 to 2014
$5.5M
DNA POLYMERASES IN NORMAL AND NEOPLASTIC HUMAN CELLSR01CA014835 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TERESA S · 1985 to 2006
$3.0M
CONTROL OF DNA REPLICATION AND CELL DIVISIONR01CA054415 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TERESA S · 1991 to 2007
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA09151NCI NIH HHS CA14835NCI NIH HHS CA54415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA polymerase alpha enzymes from human, and budding (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) are homologous proteins involved in initiation and replication of chromosomal DNA. Sequence comparison of human DNA polymerase alpha with that of S. cerevisiae and S. pombe shows overall levels of amino acid sequence identity of 32% and 34%, respectively. We report here that, despite the sequence conservation among these three enzymes, functionally active human DNA polymerase alpha fails to rescue several different conditional lethal alleles of the budding yeast POL1 gene at nonpermissive temperature. Furthermore, human DNA polymerase alpha cannot complement a null allele of budding yeast POL1 either in germinating spores or in vegetatively growing cells. In fission yeast, functionally active human DNA polymerase alpha is also unable to complement the disrupted pol alpha::ura4+ allele in germinating spores. Thus, in vivo, DNA polymerase alpha has stringent species specificity for initiation and replication of chromosomal DNA.

Indexed as

DNA Polymerase ISaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAllelesAmino Acid SequenceConserved SequenceDNA Polymerase IIFungal ProteinsGenetic Complementation TestHumansRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomycesSequence Homology, Amino AcidSpecies SpecificityTemperatureDNA Polymerase IDNA Polymerase IIFungal ProteinsPOL1 protein, S cerevisiaeRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID8246900
OpenAlexW2068315549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.