Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8245673›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease1993

Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the German Multicentre Study.

H Kessler, P Hermanek, H Wiebelt

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Outcomes of rectal cancer treatment--influence of age?International journal of colorectal disease · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is sphincter preservation reasonable in all patients with rectal cancer?International journal of colorectal disease · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Local therapy principles in rectal carcinoma].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2003
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H KesslerDepartment of Surgery, University of Erlangen, Germany.
P Hermanek
H Wiebelt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An analysis of operative mortality for carcinoma of the rectum in the German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma (SGCRC) comprising 1115 operated patients, found a total operative mortality rate of 4.3% and a 30-day-mortality rate of 2.8%. Advanced age, severe concurrent disease, anastomotic leakage in anterior resections and institution were found to be factors with independent significant influence. In anterior resections, especially low anterior resections, with protective enterostomy, the lower rates of anastomotic leakage and mortality emphasize the advantages of protective enterostomy.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaCause of DeathComorbidityHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID8245673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.