ArticleHuman genetics1993
Data on the CGG repeat at the fragile X site in the non-retarded Japanese population and family suggest the presence of a subgroup of normal alleles predisposing to mutate.
Article in Human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and implications of fragile X premutation screening in Thailand.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome in Patients with Cerebellar Ataxia in Japan.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022Article
- The significance of FMR1 CGG repeats in Chinese women with premature ovarian insufficiency and diminished ovarian reserve.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Article
- Fragile X CGG repeat variation in Tamil Nadu, South India: a comparison of radioactive and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction in CGG repeat sizing.Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2012Article
- No association between FMR1 premutations and multiple system atrophy.Journal of neurology · 2004Article
- Distribution of CGG repeat sizes within the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) homologue in a non-human primate population.Human genetics · 2003Article
- FMR1 haplotype analyses among Indians: a weak founder effect and other findings.Human genetics · 2003Article
- Predisposition to the fragile X syndrome in Jews of Tunisian descent is due to the absence of AGG interruptions on a rare Mediterranean haplotype.American journal of human genetics · 1997Article
- Positive fragile X microsatellite associations point to a common mechanism of dynamic mutation evolution.American journal of human genetics · 1996Article
- FMR1 in global populations.American journal of human genetics · 1996Article
- Expansion of the CGG repeat in fragile X in the FMR1 gene depends on the sex of the offspring.American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
- The high prevalence of fragile X premutation carrier females: is this frequency unique to the French Canadian population?American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
- FMR1 triplet arrays: paying the price for perfection.Journal of medical genetics · 1995Review
- Unusual (CGG)n expansion and recombination in a family with fragile X and DiGeorge syndrome.Journal of medical genetics · 1995Article
- Apparent regression of the CGG repeat in FMR1 to an allele of normal size.Human genetics · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fragile X mutation is the result of amplification in the repeat number of p(CGG)n in FMR-1; alleles with more than 52 repeats have been shown to be so unstable as to mutate in the repeat number in almost every transmission. To improve our understanding of mutations in normal alleles of FMR-1, the following studies were carried out in the Japanese population: a study on length variation in the repeat to determine the allele distribution of the repeat length in a non-retarded population, family studies to observe new mutations in normal allele, and haplotype analyses with microsatellite markers flanking the repeat to confirm estimated mutation rates and founder chromosomes in the fragile X syndrome. Analysis of the p(CGG)n in 370 unrelated males detected 24 distinct alleles with repeats of 18-44. A comparison with previously reported data suggests the presence of racial/ethnic differences in the allele distribution. No premutation allele was found in 824 unrelated X chromosomes examined by the polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot analysis. Family studies detected one new mutation in a total of 303 meioses. However, the mutation rate was not in accordance with the expected or observed heterozygosities in the population or with linkage disequilibrium observed between the repeat numbers and the haplotypes of the markers flanking the CGG. The haplotype in the chromosome in which the new mutation was found was the same as that frequently found in the Japanese fragile X chromosomes, and the variance in the CGG repeat number was wider in chromosomes with the haplotypes frequently found in the fragile X chromosome than in those with the other haplotypes. These observations suggest that a subgroup is present in normal alleles and that this subgroup is more liable to mutate than others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.