Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8240240›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal1993

The cytoplasmic domain of C-CAM is required for C-CAM-mediated adhesion function: studies of a C-CAM transcript containing an unspliced intron.

P H Cheung, O Culic, Y Qiu, K Earley, N Thompson, D C Hixson, S H Lin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanism and function of CEACAM1 splice isoforms.European journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  2. CEACAM1 in Liver Injury, Metabolic and Immune Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P H CheungDepartment of Molecular Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
O Culic
Y Qiu
K Earley
N Thompson
D C Hixson
S H Lin
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRhode Island Hospital · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
STUDIES ON LIVER ECTO-ATPASE AS A CELL ADHESION MOLECULER01GM043189 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIN, SUE-HWA · 1991 to 1995
–
NCI NIH HHS CA16672NCI NIH HHS CA42715NIGMS NIH HHS GM43189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-CAM105 (also named C-CAM) is a cell surface glycoprotein involved in intercellular adhesion of rat hepatocytes. It has four extracellular immunoglobulin (Ig) domains, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic domain and therefore is a member of the Ig supergene family. We have characterized multiple cDNAs of the C-CAM genes in rat intestine. Sequence analyses showed that rat intestine contained not only the previously reported L-form and S-form C-CAMs (renamed C-CAM1 and C-CAM2 respectively) but also a new isoform, C-CAM3. The C-CAM3 transcript codes for a polypeptide with a truncated C-terminus that lacks 65 amino acids from the previously reported C-CAM1 cytoplasmic domain. Unlike C-CAM1, C-CAM3 did not mediate cell adhesion when expressed in insect cells using the baculoviral expression system. Thus the extra 65 amino acids in the cytoplasmic domain of C-CAM1 are important for adhesion phenotype when expressed in insect cells. Although C-CAM1 and C-CAM2 are encoded by different genes, sequence analysis suggests that C-CAM3 is probably derived from alternative splicing of the C-CAM1 gene. To examine this possibility, we have determined the exon organization of the C-CAM1 gene. C-CAM3 differed from C-CAM1 by the presence of a single unspliced intron which contained a stop codon immediately after the regular splice junction. As a result, translation of C-CAM3 terminates at the point where C-CAM1 and C-CAM3 sequences diverge. To investigate the expression of C-CAM1, C-CAM2 and C-CAM3 in different tissues, we used an RNAase-protection assay to simultaneously assess the levels of expression of these transcripts. Using total RNA prepared from various tissues, we showed that expression of C-CAM3 was tissue-specific, and the C-CAM3 transcript accounted for about 25% of the transcripts derived from the C-CAM1 gene. However, further analysis revealed that C-CAM3 transcript was not present in cytosolic RNA, rather it was enriched in nuclear RNA prepared from hepatocytes. Although C-CAM3 cDNA contains the polyadenylation signal and is polyadenylated, these results indicate that C-CAM3 is probably an incomplete spliced product of C-CAM1 gene.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesCell AdhesionIntronsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigens, CDBaculoviridaeBase SequenceCell Adhesion MoleculesCell LineDNA, ComplementaryMolecular Sequence DataMothsRatsRNA, MessengerRNA SplicingAdenosine TriphosphatasesAntigens, CDCD66 antigensCell Adhesion MoleculesDNA, ComplementaryRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID8240240
PMCPMC1134899
OpenAlexW2412514754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.