Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8227415›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1993

Prognostic importance of DNA flow cytometric variables in rhabdomyosarcomas.

L C Wijnaendts, J C van der Linden, P van Diest, A J van Unnik, J F Delemarre, P A Voûte, C J Meijer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L C WijnaendtsDepartment of Pathology, Free University of Amsterdam.
J C van der Linden
P van Diest
A J van Unnik
J F Delemarre
P A Voûte
C J Meijer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine whether DNA ploidy patterns and S phase fraction offer prognostic information in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

methodsDNA flow cytometry was performed on formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded samples from primary tumours, and metastatic deposits or recurrences in 70 patients. DNA histogram analysis was done using a semi-automated cell cycle analysis program.

resultsOf the 70 primary tumours, 23 were DNA diploid, 32 DNA aneuploid, eight DNA multiploid, and seven DNA tetraploid. The prognosis for DNA aneuploid patterns was favourable, intermediate within the group of DNA tetraploid tumours and poor among patients with DNA diploid and DNA multiploid tumours (p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) DNA ploidy was an important independent prognostic factor, along with TNM stage, localisation, and histopathological classification. Ten out of 32 patients with a high S phase fraction (> 15%) with primary RMS achieved long term survival in contrast to 20 out of 29 patients with a low S phase fraction (< or = 15%) (p = 0.008). In 24 cases the DNA ploidy of cases of relapse was analysed. Of the 15 cases, in which stem line changes had occurred, 13 died of disease. No stem line changes were noted in nine cases and in this group four patients died of disease (p = 0.02).

conclusionsAssessment of DNA ploidy and S phase fraction in primary RMS and evaluation of stem line changes in cases of relapse are important variables in predicting prognosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFlow CytometryHumansInfantMalePloidiesPrognosisRegression AnalysisRhabdomyosarcomaS PhaseTime FactorsDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID8227415
PMCPMC501625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.