ArticleHuman genetics1993
Molecular analysis of a ring chromosome X in a family with fragile X syndrome.
Article in Human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inactivition of CDKL3 mildly inhibits proliferation of cells at VZ/SVZ in brain.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Two new cases of FMR1 deletion associated with mental impairment.American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phenotypically normal sister of a patient affected by fragile X syndrome was referred for genetic counselling and was found to carry a mosaic karyotype 46,X,r(X)/45,X. Because the probability of the simultaneous chance occurrence of fragile X syndrome and a ring chromosome X in the same family is very low, we postulated that the breakpoint of the ring chromosome X originated in the cytogenetic break in Xq27.3 responsible for fragile X syndrome. In order to determine the relative positions of the breakpoint on the ring chromosome X and the (CGG)n unstable sequence responsible for the fragile X mutation, we used molecular markers to analyse the telomeric regions of chromosome X in this family. The results showed that the ring chromosome X was the maternal fragile X chromosome and that the telomeric deletion on the long arm encompassed the (CGG)n sequence. This suggests that the cytogenetic break in Xq27.3 is distinct from the unstable (CGG)n sequence, or that the break followed by the end-to-end fusion creating the ring chromosome was not completely conservative. Analysis of DNA markers on the short arm of chromosome X evidenced a deletion of a large part of the pseudoautosomal region, allowing us to position the genes involved in stature and in some syndromes associated with telomeric deletions of Xp on the proximal side of the pseudoautosomal region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.