Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology1993
Amlodipine in patients with angina uncontrolled by atenolol. A double blind placebo controlled cross over trial.
Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management angina. North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Guideline
- Monotherapy with amlodipine or atenolol versus their combination in stable angina pectoris.Clinical cardiology · 2000Trial
- Rationale and design of the Medical Research Council's Precision Medicine with Zibotentan in Microvascular Angina (PRIZE) trial.American heart journal · 2020Article
- Amlodipine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.Drugs · 1995Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are established second line treatment for angina uncontrolled by beta-adrenergic blockers. Amlodipine is a recently introduced, dihydropyridine with a long half life. In a double blind, placebo controlled, cross over trial we assessed the efficacy and safety of amlodipine in 20 patients with persistent angina despite treatment with atenolol. 17 male patients (mean age 58 y) completed the study. Two patients were withdrawn during placebo because of worsening angina and one withdrew whilst on amlodipine because of palpitations. Compared with baseline, amlodipine prolonged exercise time to S-T segment depression by a median of 12.5%; significantly more than was found with placebo (median 0%). The improvement in exercise time and time to angina also tended to be greater for amlodipine than placebo. GTN consumption, at a median of 1.3/week, was significantly less with amlodipine than placebo (2.8). Attacks of angina were also reduced. Standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures and sitting systolic blood pressure were lower with amlodipine than placebo. Heart rate did not change. There was no change in cardiac output (measured by doppler aortovelography) when amlodipine was added to atenolol. Holter monitor measurements of 24 h maximum and minimum heart rate, heart rate variation and extrasystole counts were the same for amlodipine and placebo. In conclusion, amlodipine is effective in patients with angina inadequately controlled by atenolol alone, and does not interfere with cardiac rhythm or function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.