Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8222330›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1993

Antigen-presenting capacity of macrophages and dendritic cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis.

M G Betjes, C W Tuk, D G Struijk, R T Krediet, L Arisz, R H Beelen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M G BetjesDepartment of Cell Biology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C W Tuk
D G Struijk
R T Krediet
L Arisz
R H Beelen
Academic Medical Center · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study the antigen-presenting capacity of human peritoneal cells and the influence of continuous ambulant peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) were studied. On average 6% of the peritoneal cells were dendritic cells (DC), with no difference between CAPD and control peritoneal cells. DC were enriched by selecting for non-adherent, Fc receptor-negative, low density cells. A typical spot-like CD68 positivity was seen in DC, in contrast to the pancytoplasmic staining pattern in macrophages. Peritoneal DC morphologically and functionally showed features of cells belonging to the DC lineage. Peritoneal DC were superior antigen-presenting cells for both allo-antigen, and Candida albicans antigen or purified protein derivative. CAPD peritoneal macrophages were two- to three-fold better stimulator cells for allogeneic T cells compared with control macrophages. The level of integrins/adhesins or MHC class I or II, as measured semi-quantitatively on the FACS, could not account for this phenomenon. In addition, a double chamber system showed that dialysate-activated macrophages produced soluble factors that could enhance DC-induced allogeneic T cell proliferation. In conclusion, human peritoneal cells contain a relatively high percentage of classical DC. CAPD treatment does not impair the antigen-presenting capacity of peritoneal cells, but instead upregulates the allo-antigen-presenting capacity of peritoneal macrophages.

Indexed as

Antigen-Presenting CellsDendritic CellsFemaleHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKidney Failure, ChronicLymphocyte Culture Test, MixedMacrophagesPeritoneal CavityPeritoneal Dialysis, Continuous AmbulatoryT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID8222330
PMCPMC1534228
OpenAlexW1978341972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.