Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8218896›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1993

Bending stiffness of lipid bilayers: IV. Interpretation of red cell shape change.

T M Fischer

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T M FischerInstitut für Physiologie, Medizinische Einrichtungen der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two mechanisms are operative when the resting shape of human red cells is changed into an echinocyte or a stomatocyte. The first (bilayer couple) is a differential change in the surface area of the two monolayers. It rests on the two-dimensional isotropic elasticity of the two monolayers and their fixed distance. The second (single layer) is a change in the average cone angle of the molecules comprising a monolayer. It rests on the intrinsic bending elasticity of each single layer. With a few exceptions the first mechanism has been quoted to interpret experimentally observed shape changes. To reconsider this preference two types of spontaneous curvatures (in bilayer couple bending and in single-layer bending) are defined. It is shown that (a) disregarding the single-layer mechanism is not justified and (b) there is too little basic information for quantitative interpretations of shape change.

Indexed as

ElasticityErythrocytesHumansLipid BilayersMathematicsMembrane LipidsModels, BiologicalLipid BilayersMembrane Lipids

Identifiers

PMID8218896
PMCPMC1225771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.