ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1993
Molecular and statistical approaches to the detection and correction of errors in genotype databases.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative trait loci analysis for molecular markers linked to agricultural traits of Pleurotus ostreatus.PloS one · 2024Article
- Rules for resolving Mendelian inconsistencies in nuclear pedigrees typed for two-allele markers.PloS one · 2017Article
- Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015Review
- William Allan Award Address: On the role and soul of a statistical geneticist.American journal of human genetics · 2011Article
- Construction of a consensus linkage map for red clover (Trifolium pratense L.).BMC plant biology · 2009Article
- Deviations from hardy-weinberg equilibrium in parental and unaffected sibling genotype data.Human heredity · 2009Article
- A third-generation microsatellite-based linkage map of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, and its comparison with the sequence-based physical map.Genome biology · 2007Article
- Genomewide high-density SNP linkage analysis of 236 Japanese families supports the existence of schizophrenia susceptibility loci on chromosomes 1p, 14q, and 20p.American journal of human genetics · 2005Article
- Detection of genotyping errors and pseudo-SNPs via deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.Genetic epidemiology · 2005Article
- A high-density screen for linkage in multiple sclerosis.American journal of human genetics · 2005Article
- Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2005Review
- Large-scale heterospecific segregation distortion in Populus revealed by a dense genetic map.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2004Article
- Article
- Population prevalence of APOE, APOC3 and PPAR-alpha mutations associated to hypertriglyceridemia in French Canadians.Journal of human genetics · 2004Article
- Genetic maps of microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers: are the distances accurate?Genetic epidemiology · 2003Article
- Nearly complete genetic maps of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) constructed by AFLP marker analysis in a full-sib family.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2003Article
- Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.American journal of human genetics · 2003Article
- Systematic evaluation of map quality: human chromosome 22.American journal of human genetics · 2002Article
- A tale of two genotypes: consistency between two high-throughput genotyping centers.Genome research · 2002Article
- Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.American journal of human genetics · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Errors in genotyping data have been shown to have a significant effect on the estimation of recombination fractions in high-resolution genetic maps. Previous estimates of errors in existing databases have been limited to the analysis of relatively few markers and have suggested rates in the range 0.5%-1.5%. The present study capitalizes on the fact that within the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) collection of reference families, 21 individuals are members of more than one family, with separate DNA samples provided by CEPH for each appearance of these individuals. By comparing the genotypes of these individuals in each of the families in which they occur, an estimated error rate of 1.4% was calculated for all loci in the version 4.0 CEPH database. Removing those individuals who were clearly identified by CEPH as appearing in more than one family resulted in a 3.0% error rate for the remaining samples, suggesting that some error checking of the identified repeated individuals may occur prior to data submission. An error rate of 3.0% for version 4.0 data was also obtained for four chromosome 5 markers that were retyped through the entire CEPH collection. The effects of these errors on a multipoint map were significant, with a total sex-averaged length of 36.09 cM with the errors, and 19.47 cM with the errors corrected. Several statistical approaches to detect and allow for errors during linkage analysis are presented. One method, which identified families containing possible errors on the basis of the impact on the maximum lod score, showed particular promise, especially when combined with the limited retyping of the identified families. The impact of the demonstrated error rate in an established genotype database on high-resolution mapping is significant, raising the question of the overall value of incorporating such existing data into new genetic maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8213837PMC1682304What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.