ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1994
Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are low and high utilization related to the way GPs manage their practices? An observational study.BMC family practice · 2018Observational
- Factors associated with the achievement of cervical smears by general practitioners.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Blood pressure and cholesterol level checks as dynamic interrelated screening examinations.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain.PloS one · 2017Article
- Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes.Health economics review · 2015Article
- Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008.BMJ open · 2013Article
- Uptake of breast screening is influenced by current religion and religion of upbringing.Journal of religion and health · 2013Article
- Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Using record linkage to monitor equity and variation in screening programmes.BMC medical research methodology · 2012Article
- Predictors of mortality in HIV-associated hospitalizations in Portugal: a hierarchical survival model.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- Inpatient charges among HIV/AIDS patients in Rhode Island from 2000-2004.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- What determines a patient's treatment? Evidence from out of hours primary care co-op data in the Republic of Ireland.Health care management science · 2007Article
- Do standardised patients lose their confidence in primary medical care? Personal experiences of standardised patients with GPs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
- Best practice in primary care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Access to health care for ethnic minority populations.Postgraduate medical journal · 2005Review
- Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2003Article
- Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls.Quality & safety in health care · 2003Article
- Relationship style between GPs and community mental health teams affects referral rates.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
- Use of preventive care services, beneficiary characteristics, and Medicare HMO performance.Health care financing review · 2001Article
- Cross sectional study of primary care groups in London: association of measures of socioeconomic and health status with hospital admission rates.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo produce practice and patient variables for general practices from census and family health services authority data, and to determine the importance of these variables in explaining variation in cervical smear uptake rates between practices.
designPopulation based study examining variations in cervical smear uptake rates among 126 general practices using routine data.
settingMerton, Sutton, and Wandsworth Family Health Services Authority, which covers parts of inner and outer London.
main outcome measurePercentage of women aged 25-64 years registered with a general practitioner who had undergone a cervical smear test during the five and a half years preceding 31 March 1992.
resultsCervical smear uptake rates varied from 16.5% to 94.1%. The estimated percentage of practice population from ethnic minority groups correlated negatively with uptake rates (r = -0.42), as did variables associated with social deprivation such as overcrowding (r = -0.42), not owning a car (r = -0.41), and unemployment (r = -0.40). Percentage of practice population under 5 years of age correlated positively with uptake rate (r = 0.42). Rates were higher in practices with a female partner than in those without (66.6% v 49.1%; difference 17.5% (95% confidence interval 10.5% to 24.5%)), and in computerised than in non-computerised practices (64.5% v 50.5%; 14.0% (6.4% to 21.6%)). Rates were higher in larger practices. In a stepwise multiple regression model that explained 52% of variation, five factors were significant predictors of uptake rates: presence of a female partner; children under 5; overcrowding; number of women aged 35-44 as percentage of all women aged 25-64; change of address in past year.
conclusionsOver half of variation in cervical smear uptake rates can be explained by patient and practice variables derived from census and family health services authority data; these variables may have a role in explaining variations in performance of general practices and in producing adjusted measures of practice performance. Practices with a female partner had substantially higher uptake rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.