Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8202517›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994

Suppression of Myc, but not E1a, transformation activity by Max-associated proteins, Mad and Mxi1.

E G Lahoz, L Xu, N Schreiber-Agus, R A DePinho

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. An overview of MYC and its interactome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulation of the MAD1 promoter by G-CSF.Nucleic acids research · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E G LahozDepartment of Microbiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.
L Xu
N Schreiber-Agus
R A DePinho
Yeshiva University · USCentre for Cancer Biology · AU

Funding

REGULATION OF MYC NETWORK FUNCTION IN DEVELOPMENTR01HD028317 · NICHD · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI DEPINHO, RONALD ANTHONY · 1991 to 1999
–
GENETICS AND BIOCHEMISTRY OF CELLULAR REGULATIONT32GM007128 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI STANLEY, PAMELA M · 1985 to 1996
–
NICHD NIH HHS HD28317-02NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mad and Mxi1, two members of the Myc-related basic-region helix-loop-helix/leucine-zipper family of proteins, associate directly with Max to form sequence-specific DNA binding heterodimers that are transactivation-incompetent. Mad-Max complexes have been shown to exert a strong repressive effect on Myc-induced transactivation, perhaps through the competitive occupation of common promoter binding sites also recognized by active Myc-Max heterodimers. To place these recent biochemical observations in a biological context, mad and mxi1 expression vectors were tested for their ability to influence Myc transformation activity in the rat embryo fibroblast cooperation assay. Addition of an equimolar amount of mad or mxi1 expression vector to mouse c-myc/ras cotransfections resulted in a dramatic reduction in both the number of foci generated and the severity of the malignant phenotype. Myc-specific suppression by Mad and Mxi1 was demonstrated by their ability to affect c- and N-myc-, but not ela-, induced transformation. In contrast, mad and mxi1 expression constructs bearing deletions in the basic region exerted only mild repressive effects on Myc transformation activity, suggesting that occupation of common DNA binding sites by transactivation-incompetent Mad-Max or Mxi1-Max complexes appears to play a more dominant role in this suppression than titration of limited intracellular pools of Max away from active Myc-Max complexes. Thus, these biological data support a current model for regulation of Myc function in which relative intracellular levels of Mad and Mxi1 in comparison to those of Myc may determine the degree of activation of Myc-responsive growth pathways.

Indexed as

Genes, mycGenes, Tumor SuppressorRepressor ProteinsTranscription FactorsAdenovirus E1A ProteinsAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA-Binding ProteinsGene ExpressionHelix-Loop-Helix MotifsIn Vitro TechniquesLeucine ZippersMutagenesis, Site-DirectedRatsRNA, MessengerAdenovirus E1A ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsMXI1 protein, humanMxi1 protein, mouseMxi1 protein, ratRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID8202517
PMCPMC44024
OpenAlexW2082657038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.