Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8198134›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1994

Detection of tandem duplications and implications for linkage analysis.

T C Matise, A Chakravarti, P I Patel, J R Lupski, E Nelis, V Timmerman, C Van Broeckhoven, D E Weeks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic disorders ten years on.Genome medicine · 2009
    Article
  5. Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2009
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chromosomal duplications in bacteria, fruit flies, and humans.American journal of human genetics · 1996
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T C MatiseUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Human Genetics, PA 15261.
A Chakravarti
P I Patel
J R Lupski
E Nelis
V Timmerman
C Van Broeckhoven
D E Weeks

Funding

GENETIC HETEROGENEITY IN HUMAN DISEASER01HG000344 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHAKRAVARTI, ARAVINDA · 1990 to 1992
–
NOVEL ALGORITHMS FOR GENETIC MAPPINGR01HG000932 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEEKS, DANIEL E · 1993 to 1998
–
NHGRI NIH HHS HG00344NHGRI NIH HHS HG00932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first demonstration of an autosomal dominant human disease caused by segmental trisomy came in 1991 for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A). For this disorder, the segmental trisomy is due to a large tandem duplication of 1.5 Mb of DNA located on chromosome 17p11.2-p12. The search for the CMT1A disease gene was misdirected and impeded because some chromosome 17 genetic markers that are linked to CMT1A lie within this duplication. To better understand how such a duplication might affect genetic analyses in the context of disease gene mapping, we studied the effects of marker duplication on transmission probabilities of marker alleles, on linkage analysis of an autosomal dominant disease, and on tests of linkage homogeneity. We demonstrate that the undetected presence of a duplication distorts transmission ratios, hampers fine localization of the disease gene, and increases false evidence of linkage heterogeneity. In addition, we devised a likelihood-based method for detecting the presence of a tandemly duplicated marker when one is suspected. We tested our methods through computer simulations and on CMT1A pedigrees genotyped at several chromosome 17 markers. On the simulated data, our method detected 96% of duplicated markers (with a false-positive rate of 5%). On the CMT1A data our method successfully identified two of three loci that are duplicated (with no false positives). This method could be used to identify duplicated markers in other regions of the genome and could be used to delineate the extent of duplications similar to that involved in CMT1A.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAllelesCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Computer SimulationGenes, DominantGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenotypeHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, GeneticMultigene FamilyPedigreePhenotypeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8198134
PMCPMC1918201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.