Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8193639›Full record

ReviewTransgenic research1994

Metabolic engineering of plant secondary products.

C L Nessler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Transgenic research, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of metabolic pathways by the growth of cells in the presence of organic solvents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C L NesslerDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University College Station 77843-3258.

Funding

REGULATION OF THE CAMPTOTHECIN BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAYR01CA057592 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI MC KNIGHT, THOMAS D · 1992 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA57592-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants interact with their environment by producing a diverse array of secondary metabolites. Many of these compounds are valued for their medicinal, industrial or agricultural properties. Other secondary products are toxic or otherwise undesirable and can reduce the commercial value of crops. Gene transfer technology offers new opportunities to modify directly plant secondary product synthesis through metabolic engineering. This article reviews some of the strategies which have been used to increase or decrease the synthesis of specific plant metabolites, as well as methods for expanding the biosynthetic capabilities of individual species.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesGene ExpressionGenes, PlantPlantsPlants, Genetically Modified

Identifiers

PMID8193639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.