Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8191794›Full record

ArticleSozial- und Praventivmedizin1994

[Drug treatment of patients with heart infarcts before and after the acute stage: results of the Heart Infarct Registry Augsburg].

M Lewis, H Löwel, A Hörmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sozial- und Praventivmedizin, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M LewisZentralklinikum Augsburg.
H Löwel
A Hörmann
University Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the changes in medications prescribed before and after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), all surviving patients aged 25-74 years registered from 1985-1988 in the Coronary Event Register Augsburg were evaluated by sex, medical history, and drug use before and after the event. For the 1546 hospitalized patients (1181 men, 365 women) utilization of all drug groups is higher for patients with reinfarction than for patients with first-ever AMI. Before AMI, but not on hospital discharge, women received significantly more medications than men and were more frequently treated with diuretics (30%; men 18%), antihypertensive drugs (15%, men 8%) and cardiac glycosides (20%; men 14%). The most frequently used drug groups are nitrates (before AMI: 30%; after AMI: 80%) and calcium antagonists (before AMI: 26%; after AMI 61%). The four years show a significant increase in patients with reinfarction who were treated with platelet aggregation inhibitors (1985: 9%; 1988: 32%), as well as an increase in AMI patients released from hospital with this medication (1985: 38%; 1988: 64%). A concomitant significant decrease in reinfarction rates for men is found in the course of the four years under study. The results indicate a rapid assimilation of the results of clinical trials in practice down to the substance level.

Indexed as

Drug UtilizationAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersCardiac GlycosidesClinical Trials as TopicDiureticsFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersCardiac GlycosidesDiureticsNitratesPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID8191794
OpenAlexW2052531644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.