Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8171034›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994

Correction of the DNA repair defect in xeroderma pigmentosum group E by injection of a DNA damage-binding protein.

S Keeney, A P Eker, T Brody, W Vermeulen, D Bootsma, J H Hoeijmakers, S Linn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DNA damage response.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2011
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S KeeneyDivision of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
A P Eker
T Brody
W Vermeulen
D Bootsma
J H Hoeijmakers
S Linn
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Development of Cavitating Liquid Jets for RemediationR43ES011896 · NIEHS · DYNAFLOW, INC. · PI KALUMUCK, KENNETH M. · 2002 to 2002
$100k
STUDIES OF DNA POLYMERASESR01GM030415 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LINN, STUART M · 1985 to 1999
–
NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES011896NIGMS NIH HHS GM30415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells from a subset of patients with the DNA-repair-defective disease xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group E (XP-E) are known to lack a DNA damage-binding (DDB) activity. Purified human DDB protein was injected into XP-E cells to test whether the DNA-repair defect in these cells is caused by a defect in DDB activity. Injected DDB protein stimulated DNA repair to normal levels in those strains that lack the DDB activity but did not stimulate repair in cells from other xeroderma pigmentosum groups or in XP-E cells that contain the activity. These results provide direct evidence that defective DDB activity causes the repair defect in a subset of XP-E patients, which in turn establishes a role for this activity in nucleotide-excision repair in vivo.

Indexed as

DNA RepairCells, CulturedDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMicroinjectionsNuclear ProteinsXeroderma PigmentosumDNA-Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsUVBP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID8171034
PMCPMC43721
OpenAlexW1968198873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.