Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8161174›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology1994

Expression of the lysostaphin gene of Staphylococcus simulans in a eukaryotic system.

C M Williamson, A J Bramley, A J Lax

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C M WilliamsonAFRC Institute for Animal Health, Newbury, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
A J Bramley
A J Lax
Newbury College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lysostaphin gene of Staphylococcus simulans was cloned into Escherichia coli. The 5' end of the gene was modified to include a eukaryotic start codon, the Kozak expression start site consensus sequence, and an enzyme site to facilitate manipulation of the gene. Transcription of the modified gene in vitro yielded an RNA transcript which, when added to a rabbit reticulocyte cell-free translation system, directed the synthesis of several products. The largest product, migrating at approximately 93 kDa, as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, was probably preprolysostaphin, since it was cleaved in the presence of an S. simulans culture supernatant to yield a polypeptide of a size similar to that of mature lysostaphin. When canine pancreatic microsomal vesicles were added to the translation system, translocation of the newly synthesized polypeptides occurred, as judged by protection from proteolysis. The gene was also expressed transiently from the human cytomegalovirus promoter in COS-7 cells. Active enzyme could be detected in the cell lysate, and the prokaryotic signal appeared to target secretion of active enzyme to the culture medium. The successful expression of the lysostaphin gene and processing of the precursor to produce active secreted enzyme open up the possibility of controlling staphylococcal mastitis by targeting expression of this gene to the mammary glands of transgenic animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCells, CulturedCloning, MolecularDogsEscherichia coliEukaryotic CellsGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicHaplorhiniLysostaphinMolecular Sequence DataRabbitsStaphylococcusTranscription, GeneticLysostaphin

Identifiers

PMID8161174
PMCPMC201391
OpenAlexW1556353265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.