Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8153498›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)1994

Adherence to exercise programmes. Recommendations.

J I Robison, M A Rogers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Exercise--it's never too late: the strong-for-life program.American journal of public health · 1999
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J I RobisonDepartment of Physical Education and Exercise Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
M A Rogers
Michigan State University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the widespread dissemination of information concerning the negative health consequences associated with sedentary living, adult physical activity in many industrialised nations remains well below recommended levels. Approximately 50% of individuals who start an aerobic exercise programme will stop within the first 6 months, even though it is well known that to obtain the health benefits associated with physical activity, participation must be maintained. Programmes involving the use of behaviour management techniques appear to increase short term adherence to exercise. Recently, an adherence rate of greater than 95% over 6 months was achieved in a large group of university employees who participated in aerobic training using a 'behavioural treatment packages' approach. Unfortunately, inconsistencies in the literature on definitions and measurement of adherence make valid comparisons among studies difficult. Also, long term follow-up of behavioural intervention methods and their effect on exercise adherence is generally lacking. It is likely that strategies to increase physical activity participation in the general population will demand multiple levels of intervention (personal, organisational, environmental and societal) if they are to succeed in the long term.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBehavior TherapyExerciseHumansLife StylePatient Compliance

Identifiers

PMID8153498
OpenAlexW1981581493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.