ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1994
Suppression of hen egg lysozyme-induced arthritis by intravenous antigen administration: no role in this for antigen-driven bystander suppression.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Anergy of antigen-specific T lymphocytes is a potent mechanism of intravenously induced tolerance.Immunology · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The induction of tolerance, particularly by intervention before established immunity, is widely accepted. We studied the effects of intravenous (i.v.) administration of hen egg lysozyme (HEL), before as well as after immunization, on a HEL-induced arthritis. Arthritis and also cartilage destruction were almost completely suppressed when 100 micrograms HEL was injected before immunization. Antigen-specific proliferative T cell responses and IL-2 production in vitro were inhibited. Antigen-specific immunoglobulin and IgG1 titres were equal in control and tolerized mice, in contrast to lowered IgG2a titres in tolerized animals. Detailed histological studies showed that the immune complex-dependent polymorphonuclear cell phase (< 24 h after arthritis induction) was equal for control and HEL-injected mice. Only in the T cell-dependent phase of the arthritis (> 24 h), did suppression become pronounced in tolerized mice. I.v. administration of 100 micrograms HEL after immunization could only marginally reduce infiltrate and exudate, and no reduction of cartilage destruction was seen. An elegant way to interfere in an established immunity can be offered by creation of bystander suppression. We show that i.v. administration of HEL followed by triggering with HEL, at the moment either of immunization or of arthritis induction, does not reduce a methylated bovine serum albumin (BSA)-arthritis. We conclude that arthritis can be suppressed almost totally when HEL is injected intravenously before immunization. Treatment after immunization is less effective. The i.v. induced suppression is T cell-mediated and and antigen-specific: no bystander suppression circuit can be generated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.