ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1994
The influence of anti-fibronectin antibodies on interactions involving extracellular matrix components and cells: a possible pathogenic mechanism.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of the prevalence and clinical associations of antibodies to human fibronectin in systemic lupus erythematosus.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 1995Article
- Human anti-fibronectin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: occurrence and antigenic specificity.Clinical and experimental immunology · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibodies, directed to the 30-kD collagen binding domain (CBD) of fibronectin (Fn), have been previously demonstrated in sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and we now investigate the possible pathogenic effects of these antibodies on collagen-Fn and cell-Fn interactions. The binding of type 1 collagen to Fn was demonstrated by ELISA, and could be specifically inhibited by the preincubation of solid-phase immobilized Fn with anti-Fn antibodies from SLE sera. By using indirect immunofluorescent staining, anti-Fn antibody containing SLE sera but not normal human serum (NHS) reduced the deposition of newly synthesized collagen and Fn on living human skin fibroblasts. We also found that sera from SLE patients containing anti-Fn antibodies significantly reduced thyroid cell attachment to Fn immobilized on plastic compared with NHS. These effects were shown to be due to the presence of anti-Fn antibodies in these sera, as SLE sera depleted of anti-Fn antibodies did not reduce the deposition of collagen or Fn on cultured fibroblasts, nor did they inhibit cell attachment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.