ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology1993
Effect of a new de-N-acetyl-lysoglycosphingolipid on chemically-induced inflammatory bowel disease: possible mechanism of action.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginoperineal Fistula as a Complication of Perianal Surgery in a Patient with Sjögren's Syndrome: A Case Report.Case reports in rheumatology · 2014Article
- In vitro and in vivo impact of a new glycosphingolipid on neutrophils.Agents and actions · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new, orally active de-N-acetylated lysoglycosphingolipid (WILD20) was evaluated as antiinflammatory agent using a model of chemically-induced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the rat to mimic human ulcerative colitis and Chron's disease. IBD was induced by hapten trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNB). WILD20, orally administered as preventive or curative, was demonstrated to be efficacious at daily dosages of 0.1-1 mg/kg for 4-5 days. Damage scores, body weight, spleen weight, colonic tissular levels of LTB4, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) are influenced and brought into parameters of normality. Histological observation demonstrated quicker healing, better repair, reduced inflammation, and poor eosinophil degranulation. The mechanisms underlying WILD20 antiinflammatory effects were investigated: whereas WILD20 fails to show a direct effect on PKC, it reduces PKC translocation to the membrane; cellular PLA2 was consequently greatly reduced through this mechanism and thought to be responsible for WILD20 efficacy towards chemically-induced IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8133910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.