Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8129029›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of pathology1994

Experimental production of primitive neuroectodermal tumors and its relevance to human neuro-oncology.

L B Rorke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of pathology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Medulloblastoma: therapy and biologic considerations.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2006
    Review
  4. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 1997
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

L B RorkeChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODELS OF MENTAL RETARDATIONP30HD026979 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ROBERTS, TIMOTHY P · 1990 to 2015
$15.3M
NICHD NIH HHS IP 30 HD 26979-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin and nature of central nervous system tumors primarily composed of primitive neuroepithelial cells have intrigued neuropathologists since 1925, when the prototype tumor in this group, the medulloblastoma, was defined as a specific type by Bailey and Cushing. Theories regarding this group of tumors have been widely divergent, ranging from classification as sarcomas, neuroblastomas, spongioblastomas, ie, poorly differentiated gliomas (including astrocytic, oligodendroglial, and ependymal), to primitive tumors with a capacity for multidirectional differentiation. Studies of both human and experimental primitive neuroectodermal tumors have yielded considerable information about biological features, although controversies remain regarding interpretation of the findings. Moreover, many investigators remain fixed upon the notion that discovery of the "cell of origin" of these tumors will somehow enhance understanding of their nature. Rationale for relevance of this view is examined against the current state of knowledge regarding carcinogenesis as a whole and studies of human and experimental primitive neuroectodermal tumors in particular, and it is concluded that the time has come to discard the archaic concept of cell of origin and devote resources to investigations of the phenotypic character of the tumor and its relationship to prognosis and treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasms, ExperimentalNeuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitivePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID8129029
PMCPMC1887098
OpenAlexW2259960117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.