ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1993
Contraction-induced movements of water in single fibres of frog skeletal muscle.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer physics: diagnostics based on damped cellular elastoelectrical vibrations in microtubules.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2011Article
- Intramuscular drug transport under mechanical loading: resonance between tissue function and uptake.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2009Article
- Structural biomechanics modulate intramuscular distribution of locally delivered drugs.Journal of biomechanics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although X-ray diffraction measurements imply almost constant filament separation during isometric contraction, such constancy does not hold at the level of the isolated cell; cell cross-section increases substantially during isometric contraction. This expansion could arise from accumulation of water drawn from other fibre regions, or from water drawn into the cell from outside. To distinguish between these hypotheses, we froze single fibres of frog skeletal muscle that were jacketed by a thin layer of water. Frozen fibres were freeze-substituted, sectioned transversely, and examined in the electron microscope. In fibres frozen during contraction, we found large amounts of water just beneath the sarcolemma, less in deeper regions, and almost none in the fibre core. Such gradients were absent or diminished in fibres frozen in the relaxed state. The water was not confined to the myofibril space alone; we found large water spaces between myofibrils, particularly near mitochondria. Accumulation of water between myofibrils and around mitochondria implies that the driving force for water movement probably lies outside the filament lattice, and may therefore be osmotic. The fact that the distribution was nonuniform-highest near the sarcolemma and lowest in the core--implies that the water was likely drawn from the thin jacket surrounding the cell. Thus, the contractile cycle appears to be associated with water entry into and exit from the cell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.