Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8125483›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics1994

Linkage mapping of the spinal muscular atrophy gene.

A H Burghes, S E Ingraham, Z Kóte-Jarai, S Rosenfeld, N Herta, N Nadkarni, C J DiDonato, J Carpten, O Hurko, J Florence

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic Variability in the Survival Motor Neuron Genes (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. When is a deletion not a deletion? When it is converted.American journal of human genetics · 1997
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

A H BurghesDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
S E Ingraham
Z Kóte-Jarai
S Rosenfeld
N Herta
N Nadkarni
C J DiDonato
J Carpten
O Hurko
J Florence
The Ohio State University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Rochester · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common autosomal recessive disorder resulting in loss of motor neurons. We have performed linkage analysis on a panel of families using nine markers that are closely linked to the SMA gene. The highest lod score was obtained with the marker D5S351 (Zmax = 10.04 at theta = O excluding two unlinked families, and Zmax = 8.77 at theta = 0.007 with all families). One type III family did not show linkage to the 5q13 markers, and in one type I consanguineous family the affected individual did not show homozygosity except for the marker D5S435. Three recombinants were identified with the closet centromeric marker, D5S435, which position the gene telomeric of this marker. These recombinants will facilitate finer mapping of the location of the SMA gene. Lastly, two families provide strong evidence for a remarkable variability in presentation of the SMA phenotype, with the age at onset in one family varying from 17 months to 13 years.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChromosome MappingConsanguinityFemaleGenetic MarkersHaplotypesHomozygoteHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLod ScoreMaleGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8125483
OpenAlexW2031391621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.