ArticleBritish journal of cancer1994
Mediastinal large-cell lymphoma with sclerosis (MLCLS).
Article in British journal of cancer, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL): long-term results from a retrospective multicentre Italian experience in 138 patients treated with CHOP or MACOP-B/VACOP-B.British journal of cancer · 2004Trial
- Efficacy of an early intensification treatment integrating chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation and radiotherapy for poor risk primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma with sclerosis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a retrospective analysis encompassing a 14 year period (1978-92), 22 patients (age range 19-71, median 30 years) were identified as having mediastinal large-cell lymphoma with sclerosis on the basis of clinical and pathological features. At presentation, 15/22 had 'bulky' disease and 11/22 had evidence of superior vena caval obstruction. Thirteen patients had stage II disease (6,II; 7,IIE), nine presented with stage IV disease. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in only 4/22 patients with the initial adriamycin-containing regimen. 'Good partial remission' (no clinical evidence of disease, minimal abnormalities of uncertain significance on radiological investigation) was achieved in a further seven patients and 'poor partial remission' (a reduction in measurable disease > 50%) in four, giving an overall response rate of 15/22 (68%). One patient died within 48 h of arrival at the hospital; 16 of the 17 remaining patients in whom anything less than CR was achieved subsequently received additional, alternative treatment (one chemotherapy, six mediastinal radiotherapy, nine both treatment modalities) but in only 2/16 did this result in any further degree of response. With a median follow-up of 5 1/2 years, 10/22 patients remain well without progression between 6 months and 14 years (5/6 in whom CR was eventually achieved and 5/11 in whom only partial remission was ever documented). The seven patients in whom the initial treatment demonstrably failed have all died. These results suggest that a proportion of patients with this rare subtype of high-grade B-cell lymphoma may be cured by chemotherapy alone and that the presence of a residual mediastinal mass after treatment does not necessarily imply treatment failure. However, patients in whom the initial chemotherapy fails have a very grave prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.