Trial reportCalcified tissue international1994
Effects of salmon calcitonin suppositories on bone mass and turnover in established osteoporosis.
Trial report in Calcified tissue international, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calcitonin versus etidronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 1997Pooled it
- Skeletal effects of calcitonin treatment and withdrawal in ovariectomized rats.Calcified tissue international · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of salmon calcitonin (sCT) suppository in post-menopausal women with previous hip fractures as an inhibitory agent of bone loss. The study was a single blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial comparing three parallel groups of patients. Fifty-four healthy women were randomly allocated to 1 year's treatment with either sCT 100 IU/6 times a week, 200 IU/3 times a week, or placebo/6 times a week. All groups received a calcium supplement of 500 mg daily. Fifteen patients left the study before its end, six of those due to adverse events, such as abdominal and rectal pain, nausea, headache, and diarrhea. Bone mineral density of the spine and the femoral neck was measured every 26 weeks, and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured at baseline and week 12, 26, and 52. There were no significant changes in bone mineral density in the spine and in the hip in any of the treatment groups. No significant changes were observed in serum alkaline phosphatase, serum osteocalcin, urine hydroxyproline, and urine pyridinoline or deoxypyridinoline. Conclusively, we did not observe any significant effect on bone metabolism in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis after 1 year of treatment with sCT suppositories at the doses used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.