Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8118097›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society1993

In situ analysis of centromere segregation in C57BL/6 x Mus spretus interspecific backcrosses.

Y Matsuda, K F Manly, V M Chapman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mitotic Antipairing of Homologous Chromosomes.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022
    Article
  2. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2013
    Article
  3. A genomic clone containing a telomere array maps near the centromere of mouse chromosome 6.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1995
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y MatsudaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263.
K F Manly
V M Chapman
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

NHGRI NIH HHS HG-00170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of major satellite sequence differences between Mus spretus and laboratory mice provides a robust method for analyzing the centromere location for the genetic maps of each mouse chromosome. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of a genomic probe, pMR196, for the laboratory mouse major satellite sequences was used to identify C57BL/6Ros (B6) pericentromeric heterochromatin in progeny of reciprocal backcross matings. These included 80 (B6 x M. spretus)F1 x M. spretus progeny (BSS) and 70 (B6 x M. spretus)F1 x B6 (BSB) progeny. FISH analysis of pericentromeric heterochromatin was conducted on the same metaphase spreads that were karyotypically analyzed for chromosome-specific banding patterns. Analysis of chromosomal segregation suggested that there was not primary deviation from random assortment during meiosis in the interspecific hybrid female, because nearly all of the 190 pair-wise comparisons did not deviate from expected and because there was no consistent pattern of deviation of the same chromosomes in the reciprocal backcross progeny from similar (C57BL/6 x M. spretus)F1 hybrid females. These results affirm the value of using the major satellite to genetically mark pericentromeric heterochromatin in the analysis of the segregation and assortment of centromeres in Mus interspecific crosses.

Indexed as

CentromereAnimalsChromosomesCrosses, GeneticDNA, SatelliteFemaleIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuridaeDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID8118097
OpenAlexW2028145341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.