Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8117756›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience1993

Identification of the phenotype in psychiatric genetics.

M T Tsuang, S V Faraone, M J Lyons

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00071786 (Family Study of Affective and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00071786 completednot on this mapstarted 2004, after this paper: background citation

Family Study of Affective and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Ran2004Enrolled1,944ConditionsMood Disorders, Sleep Disorders, Migraine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluating endophenotypes for bipolar disorder.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Recent Genetics and Epigenetics Approaches to PTSD.Current psychiatry reports · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Cross-generational influences on childhood anxiety disorders: pathways and mechanisms.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Coping Styles in Twins Discordant for Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Depression.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M T TsuangDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Brockton-West Roxbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, MA 02401.
S V Faraone
M J Lyons

Funding

DRUG RESPONSE AND GENETIC FACTORS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH041874 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER · PI TSUANG, MING T. · 1987 to 1989
–
SCHIZOPHRENIA: PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND HETEROGENEITYR37MH043518 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI TSUANG, MING T. · 1988 to 1997
–
LINKAGE STUDIES OF SCHIZOPHRENIAU01MH046318 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI TSUANG, MING T. · 1989 to 1996
–
NIMH NIH HHS 1 R01MH41874-01NIMH NIH HHS 1 R37MH43518-01NIMH NIH HHS 5 UO1 MH46318-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical procedures and molecular genetic techniques have attained a fine degree of resolution. Their ability to find disease genes has revolutionized medicine and raised hopes for breakthroughs in psychiatry. However, such breakthroughs may require an equally discriminating nosology. A psychiatric genetic nosology seeks to classify patients into categories that correspond to distinct genetic entities by addressing the problem of diagnostic accuracy: the degree to which a diagnosis correctly classifies people with and without a putative genetic illness. We review methods that deal with misclassification in genetic studies. These are clinical and epidemiological approaches that deal directly with how to define the observable manifestation of a putative genotype. We discuss two groups of methods: those that use known phenotypes and those that design new phenotypes.

Indexed as

AgedFalse Positive ReactionsGenetic LinkageHumansMental DisordersPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID8117756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.