Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8116616›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1994

Understanding the mechanism(s) of mosaic trisomy 21 by using DNA polymorphism analysis.

C Pangalos, D Avramopoulos, J L Blouin, O Raoul, M C deBlois, M Prieur, A A Schinzel, M Gika, D Abazis, S E Antonarakis

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Verb production by individuals with Down syndrome during narration.Research in developmental disabilities · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Receptive vocabulary analysis in Down syndrome.Research in developmental disabilities · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Constitutional and acquired autosomal aneuploidy.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C PangalosDiagnostic Genetic Center, Athens, Greece.
D Avramopoulos
J L Blouin
O Raoul
M C deBlois
M Prieur
A A Schinzel
M Gika
D Abazis
S E Antonarakis

Funding

UTILIZATION OF TRANSGENICS IN THE STUDY OF DOWN SYNDROMEP01HD024605 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI REEVES, ROGER H · 1989 to 2004
$8.2M
NICHD NIH HHS HD24605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to investigate the mechanism(s) underlying mosaicism for trisomy 21, we genotyped 17 families with mosaic trisomy 21 probands, using 28 PCR-detectable DNA polymorphic markers that map in the pericentromeric region and long arm of chromosome 21. The percentage of cells with trisomy 21 in the probands' blood lymphocytes was 6%-94%. There were two classes of autoradiographic results: In class I, a "third allele" of lower intensity was detected in the proband's DNA for at least two chromosome 21 markers. The interpretation of this result was that the proband had inherited three chromosomes 21 after meiotic nondisjunction (NDJ) (trisomy 21 zygote) and subsequently lost one because of mitotic (somatic) error, the lost chromosome 21 being that with the lowest-intensity polymorphic allele. The parental origin and the meiotic stage of NDJ could also be determined. In class II, a "third allele" was never detected. In these cases, the mosaicism probably occurred either by a postzygotic, mitotic error in a normal zygote that followed a normal meiosis (class IIA mechanism); by premeiotic, mitotic NDJ yielding an aneusomic zygote after meiosis, and subsequent mitotic loss (class IIB mechanism); or by a meiosis II error with lack of crossover in the preceding meiosis I, followed by mitotic loss after fertilization (class IIC mechanism). Among class II mechanisms, the most likely is mechanism IIA, while IIC is the least likely. There were 10 cases of class I and 7 cases of class II results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21MosaicismPolymorphism, GeneticAdultChildCrossing Over, GeneticDown SyndromeFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansMaleMaternal AgePaternal AgePolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancy, High-RiskGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8116616
PMCPMC1918141
OpenAlexW1853603073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.