ArticleHuman genetics1994
Diagnosis of fragile X syndrome by direct mutation analysis.
Article in Human genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unstable mutations in the FMR1 gene and the phenotypes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2012Review
- Expansion of the fragile X CGG repeat in females with premutation or intermediate alleles.American journal of human genetics · 2003Article
- Familial transmission of the FMR1 CGG repeat.American journal of human genetics · 1996Article
- Reverse mutation in fragile X syndrome.American journal of human genetics · 1996Article
- Expansion of the CGG repeat in fragile X in the FMR1 gene depends on the sex of the offspring.American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
- The fragile X premutation in carriers and its effect on mutation size in offspring.American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 27 fragile X pedigrees consisting of over 100 nuclear families were analyzed by Southern blotting methods and probes StB12.3 and StB12.3xx to detect the expansion of the (CGG)n repeat within the FMR-1 gene and the abnormal methylation pattern of the adjacent DNA region responsible for the fragile X syndrome. Clinical expression was found to be associated with the presence of a full mutation (delta > 500 bp, associated with abnormal methylation) in all the males and 50% of the females studied, whereas individuals carrying a premutation (delta = 100-700 bp) were normal. A preferential size increase in the enlarged (CGG)n repeat was detected in successive generations, the instability being stronger when transmitted from a female than from a male. No expansion of the premutation to the full mutation occurred in the paternal transmissions, and the size increase was significantly smaller than in the maternal transmissions. This could partly explain the stability of the premutation through several generations in families with transmitting males. In the maternal transmissions, the risk of expansion of a premutation to a full mutation appeared to depend on its size. The critical maternal premutation size leading invariably to the full mutation was between delta = 175-200 bp. This is important for genetic counseling and also explains the commonly observed clustering of affected individuals in fragile X families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.