ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1993
Comparison of the cardiovascular and neural activity of endothelin-1, -2, -3 and respective proendothelins: effects of phosphoramidon and thiorphan.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-generation sequencing identifies a novel frameshift variant in FRMD7 in a Chinese family with idiopathic infantile nystagmus.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Endothelin.Pharmacological reviews · 2016Review
- Endothelin-2, the forgotten isoform: emerging role in the cardiovascular system, ovarian development, immunology and cancer.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Review
- Different pressor and bronchoconstrictor properties of human big-endothelin-1, 2 (1-38) and 3 in ketamine/xylazine-anaesthetized guinea-pigs.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Endothelins induce prostacyclin release in both vascular and non-vascular tissue.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. In the anaesthetized, ganglion-blocked rat, intravenous boluses of endothelin-1, endothelin-2 and endothelin-3 induced a transient hypotensive effect followed by a potent long lasting pressor response (ED50 mmHg: 0.72 +/- 0.05, 1.8 +/- 0.2 and 2.7 +/- 0.3 nmol kg-1, respectively). The maximal effect for the three peptides was of a similar order of magnitude (delta MAP: 84 to 89 mmHg). Neither of these effects was influenced by phosphoramidon or thiorphan (10 mg kg-1, i.v.). 2. Intravenously administered big-endothelin-1 and -2 induced a transient (1-2 min) hypotension followed by a potent long lasting (> 25 min) vasopressor effect (ED50 mmHg: 1.8 +/- 0.2 and 6.7 +/- 0.4 nmol kg-1, respectively), with a similar maximal activity (delta MAP: 85 +/- 4 and 81 +/- 2.4 mmHg, respectively). The onset of the big-endothelin-1 vasopressor effect was more rapid (5-6 min) than that of big-endothelin-2 (10-13 min). Big-endothelin-3 was found to induce only a potent, long lasting (> 35 min) hypertension, with a maximal effect of 75 +/- 4.6 mmHg at 10 nmol kg-1 and an ED50 mmHg of 6.5 +/- 0.4 nmol kg-1. The onset of this effect was much slower (20-25 min) than that of the other proendothelins. Pressor responses induced by big-endothelin-1, -2 and -3 (3, 15 and 10 nmol kg-1, respectively) were markedly reduced (60, 80 and 100%) in the presence of phosphoramidon (10 mg kg-1, i.v.). Thiorphan (10 mg kg-1, i.v.) did not inhibit the effects of big-endothelin-1, -2 and -3. 3. In the electrically stimulated rat vas deferens, endothelin-I and -2 were found to be equipotent enhancers of the twitch response (EC100%: 4.0 +/- 0.4 nm and 7.9 +/- 4.8 nm, respectively), both about 3-4 fold as active as endothelin-3 (EC100%: 19 +/- 2.5 nM). Endothelin-1 and -3 showed a comparable maximalstimulatory effect (Emax: 296 +/- 30 and 262 +/- 24%) while endothelin-2 was less active (Emax: 194 +/- 30%).4. Big-endothelin-l and -2 were potent enhancers of the twitch response too (EC 100,%: 10.0 +/- 2.6 nM and 21.6 +/- 3.2 nM, respectively), with a comparable maximal stimulatory effect (Emax: 254 +/- 22 and 264 +/-24%). Big-endothelin-3 was found to be less potent (EC,100%: 275 +/- 21 nM), but retained a marked potentiating effect (Emax: 200 +/- 38%). Phosphoramidon, but not thiorphan, concentration-dependently(10 and 100 microM) reduced big-endothelin-1 (58 and 86% respectively) and big-endothelin-2 (21 and 56%)-mediated responses. Conversely, the big-endothelin-3 effect was reduced by phosphoramidon only at 100 microM (-70%), while thiorphan acts concentration-dependently (31 and 71% at 10 and 100 microM respectively); thus, in the rat vas deferens, big-endothelin-I and -2 were as potent as their corresponding endothelins, while big-endothelin-3 was about 20 times less potent than endothelin-3.5. The increasing effect of endothelin-2 (194 +/- 30% over baseline) was significantly enhanced by either 10 microM phosphoramidon (277 +/- 42%) or thiorphan (318 +/- 15%). The endothelin-I and endothelin-3-mediated twitch enhancement was not affected by the two protease inhibitors (10 microM).6. These results suggest that in vivo big-endothelin-1, -2 and -3, are processed through a similar phosphoramid on-sensitive enzymatic pathway although with different apparent affinity. This enzymatic process is probably attributable to a neutral endoprotease, distinct from neutral-endopeptidase 24.11(NEP). On the other hand, a NEP-like enzymatic activity may be involved, in the rat vas deferens, in the activation of big-endothelin-3 to endothelin-3 and in the metabolism of endothelin-2, but not of endothelin-I or endothelin-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.