ArticleHuman genetics1993
Differential contribution of C4 and HLA-DQ genes to systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility.
Article in Human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- An overview of HLA variants in COVID-19 vaccine-induced autoimmunity.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2025Review
- Differential contribution of HLA-DR, DQ, and TAP2 alleles to systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility in Spanish patients: role of TAP2*01 alleles in Ro autoantibody production.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The particular histocompatability antigen (HLA) gene(s) that may confer systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) susceptibility remains unknown. In the present study, 58 unrelated patients and 69 controls have been analyzed for their class I and class II serologic antigens, class II (DR and DQ) DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism, their deduced DQA1 and B1 exon 2 nucleotide sequences and their corresponding amino acid residues. By using the etiologic fraction (delta) as an almost absolute measure of the strongest linkage disequilibrium of an HLA marker to the putative SLE susceptibility locus, it has been found that the strength of association of the HLA marker may be quantified as follows: DQA1*0501 (associated to DR3) or DQB1*0201 (associated to DR3) > non Asp 57 beta DQ/Arg 52 alpha DQ > DR3 > non Asp 57 beta DQ. Thus, molecular HLA DQ markers tend to be more accurate as susceptibility markers than the classical serologic markers (DR3). However, dominant or recessive non Asp 57 beta DQ susceptibility theories, as previously postulated for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, do not hold in our SLE nephritic population; indeed, three patients bear neither Arg 52 alpha DQ nor Asp 57 beta DQ suscepibility factors. On the other hand, nonsusceptibility factors are included in our population in the A30B18CF130-DR3DQ2(Dw25) haplotype and not in A1B8CS01-DR3DQ2(Dw24); this distinctive association has also been recorded in type I diabetes mellitus and may reflect the existence of common pathogenic HLA-linked factors for both diseases only in the A30B18CF10DR3DQ2(Dw25) haplotype. Finally, the observed increase of deleted C4 genes (and not 'null' C4 proteins) in nephritic patients shows that C4 genes are disease markers, but probably without a pathogenic role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.