Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8099256›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1993

Some developments on the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.

P J Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome scanning for linkage: an overview.American journal of human genetics · 1996
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Evolving Genome Project: current and future impact.American journal of human genetics · 1994
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P J WardUnité INSERM de Recherches en Epidémiologie des Cancers, U351, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some improvements are presented for the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis, which is a generalization of the sib-pair method. The test statistic is extended to include contrasts between affected and unaffected pedigree members, so that it now utilizes marker information from all typed pedigree members rather than just the typed affected members. Computer simulation using a sample pedigree of 14 individuals shows that this modification can substantially increase statistical power where there is a direct association between marker variation and disease and where disease risk is elevated in carriers of the disease allele. Data on Huntington disease in 16 British families, which were analyzed previously using only the affected individuals, are reanalyzed with the unaffected individuals included. Strong rejection of the null hypothesis of no association between Huntington disease and the HindIII polymorphism is confirmed, but the particular families in which the association is significant differs from that obtained through an analysis based only on affected individuals and reflects more closely the results obtained from a lod-score analysis. The test statistic is also modified here to incorporate contrasts between individuals of zero kinship, if needed. This enables contrasts between individuals from different pedigrees, as well as contrasts involving individuals sampled from the general population, to be incorporated into the test of association. For population data, the methodology reduces to a type of contingency-table analysis, in which the rows of the table correspond to different marker-locus genotypes and in which the two columns categorize subjects into an "affected" group versus an "unaffected," or control, group. This aspect of the methodology is illustrated using two population data sets, the first relating APO-E genotype to the frequency of individuals undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and the second relating APO-B genotype to the frequency of coronary artery disease. The present methodology confirms the lack of association between marker and disease in the former data set and confirms the presence of association in the latter. Finally, the methodology is formulated here in terms of ordinary, multiperson kinship coefficients rather than in terms of the generalized kinship coefficients originally proposed. This greatly reduces the number of coefficients to be calculated, thereby enhancing the computational efficiency of the computer program.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkagePedigreeApolipoproteins BApolipoproteins EComputer SimulationCoronary DiseaseDeoxyribonuclease HindIIIFemaleHumansHuntington DiseaseMaleModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRenal DialysisRisk FactorsApolipoproteins BApolipoproteins EDeoxyribonuclease HindIII

Identifiers

PMID8099256
PMCPMC1682267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.