ReviewWorld journal of urology1994
The value of molecular genetic analysis in the diagnosis and prognosis of renal cell tumours.
Review in World journal of urology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of mosaic loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY) in men of advanced age.Biogerontology · 2024Review
- Loss of the Y Chromosome: A Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Age Inference, and Implications for Men's Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of kidney cancer: a primer for urologists.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2007Article
- Papillary renal cell carcinoma within a renal oncocytoma: case report of an incidental finding of a tumour within a tumour.Journal of clinical pathology · 2007Article
- Incidental and symptomatic renal tumors: impact on patient survival.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2002Article
- Expression of CD44 isoforms in renal cell tumors. Positive correlation to tumor differentiation.The American journal of pathology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Renal cell tumours have a heterogeneous morphology, which may also be changed during tumour progression. Through the use of molecular cytogenetic techniques, it has become possible to divide renal cell tumours into genetically well-defined entities. Papillary renal cell tumours are characterized by loss of the Y chromosome and trisomy of chromosomes 3q, 7, 8, 12, 16, 17 and 20. Non-papillary renal cell carcinomas show a specific loss of chromosome 3p and trisomy of chromosome 5q sequences and frequent loss of chromosome 6q, 8p, 9 and 14q sequences. Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas are marked by a highly specific combination of loss of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17 and 21 and gross rearrangement of mitochondrial DNA. Subsets of renal oncocytomas show minimal karyotype alterations or translocation 11q13;? or loss of the Y chromosome and chromosome 1. There are some data suggesting that molecular genetic markers may be used not only for diagnosing of renal cell tumours but also for predicting the prognosis of tumour subtypes. Trisomy of chromosomes 7 and 17 and loss of the Y chromosome marks papillary renal cell adenomas, whereas additional trisomies such as those of chromosomes 3q, 8, 12, 16 and 20 are associated with papillary renal cell carcinomas. Although non-papillary renal cell tumours develop as a carcinoma, their clinical behaviour is in strong correlation with secondary karyotype changes such as loss of chromosomes 6q, 8p, 9 and 14q.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.