Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8085791›Full record

ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek

Phylogenetic relationships of Bacteria based on comparative sequence analysis of elongation factor Tu and ATP-synthase beta-subunit genes.

W Ludwig, J Neumaier, N Klugbauer, E Brockmann, C Roller, S Jilg, K Reetz, I Schachtner, A Ludvigsen, M Bachleitner

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Population genomics and the bacterial species concept.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2009
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Origin and evolution of the mitochondrial proteome.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2000
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

W LudwigLehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität München, Germany.
J Neumaier
N Klugbauer
E Brockmann
C Roller
S Jilg
K Reetz
I Schachtner
A Ludvigsen
M Bachleitner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative sequence analyses were performed on 14 genes encoding bacterial elongation factors EF-Tu and 7 genes encoding the beta-subunit of bacterial F1F0 type ATP-synthases. The corresponding predicted amino acid sequences were compared with published primary structures of homologous molecules. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed from both data sets of aligned protein sequences and from an equivalent selection of 16S rRNA sequences by applying distance matrix and maximum parsimony methods. The EF-Tu data were in very good agreement with the rRNA data, although the resolution within the EF-Tu tree was reduced at certain phylogenetic levels. The resolution power of the ATPase beta-subunit sequence data were more reduced than those of the EF-Tu data. In comparison with the 16S rRNA tree there are minor differences in the order of adjacent branchings within the ATPase beta-subunit tree.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialPhylogenyAmino Acid SequenceBacteriaBase SequenceDNA PrimersMacromolecular SubstancesMolecular Sequence DataPeptide Elongation Factor TuPolymerase Chain ReactionProton-Translocating ATPasesRestriction MappingSequence Homology, Amino AcidDNA PrimersMacromolecular SubstancesPeptide Elongation Factor TuProton-Translocating ATPases

Identifiers

PMID8085791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.