ArticleHistochemistry1994
Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor by scanning electron microscopy.
Article in Histochemistry, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Molecular basis for multimerization in the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor.eLife · 2016Article
- Immunolocalization of two lignin O-methyltransferases in stems of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).Protoplasma · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A method of immunocytochemistry and low-voltage scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is described for visualization of the epidermal growth factor membrane receptor (EGFR). The specific labelling is achieved of antigenic sites on the surface of prefixed cells. The advantage of this approach over existing techniques is the capability for unlimited high-resolution surface examination at the single cell level. This is achieved by using low acceleration voltage (V0) and either very thin or no coating of the specimens to prevent the label from being masked. Furthermore, by using conventional field emission SEM and a highly sensitive detector for backscattered electrons, detection of the gold-conjugate (< 10 nm in diameter) becomes possible even at low V0. A431 cells (human epidermoid carcinoma) show intercellular variability in their EGFR area density. Highest density was recorded upon cells in the mitotic stage of the cell cycle due to a decrease in the relative surface of rounded versus flattened cells. At the ultrastructural level a marked heterogeneity was also seen on the surface of contracted cells, where enhanced labelling could be observed only at the tips of microvilli. In contrast, spread cells displayed a homogeneous receptor distribution due to their smooth surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.