ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology1994
Comparison of chromosomal distribution of a retroposon (LINE) and a retrovirus-like element mys in Peromyscus maniculatus and P. leucopus.
Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- LINE-1 and SINE-B1 mapping and genome diversification inLife science alliance · 2022Article
- Comparative Genomic In Situ Hybridization and the Possible Role of Retroelements in the Karyotypic Evolution of Three Akodontini Species.International journal of genomics · 2017Article
- LINE-1 distribution in six rodent genomes follow a species-specific pattern.Journal of genetics · 2016Article
- Article
- Recent amplification of the kangaroo endogenous retrovirus, KERV, limited to the centromere.Journal of virology · 2011Article
- Article
- Genomic characterization of recent human LINE-1 insertions: evidence supporting random insertion.Genome research · 2001Article
- The end of the LINE?: lack of recent L1 activity in a group of South American rodents.Genetics · 2000Article
- Chromosomal distribution of the hamster intracisternal A-particle (IAP) retrotransposons.Chromosoma · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosomal distribution for two interspersed elements (LINEs and mys) that are thought to have established their chromosomal position primarily by transposition was compared between two species of deer mice (Peromyscus leucopus and P. maniculatus). Both LINEs and mys generally produced an autosomal banding pattern reflective of G-bands and both hybridized preferentially to the sex chromosomes. The pattern on the long arm of the X was unique for each, with mys reflecting the G-bands (four bands with the telomeric most prominent) and LINE producing five equally spaced bands of equal intensity. LINE also preferentially hybridized to the short arm of the longest autosomal pair. Some aspects of these patterns are explained adequately with proposed mechanisms that would produce a non-random pattern of chromosomal distribution (i.e. both reflect autosomal G-bands and both preferentially insert into AT-rich regions characteristic of G-bands). However, other aspects such as the differences observed on the long arm of the X do not appear to fit any predictions of proposed mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8069462What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.