Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8065299›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1994

A mammalian origin of bidirectional DNA replication within the Chinese hamster RPS14 locus.

E S Tasheva, D J Roufa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E S TashevaDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.
D J Roufa
Kansas State University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF HUMAN RIBOSOMAL PROTEINSR01GM023013 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROUFA, DONALD J · 1985 to 1994
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM23013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two complementary experimental approaches have been used to identify a chromosomal origin of bidirectional DNA replication within or immediately downstream of the Chinese hamster ribosomal protein S14 gene (RPS14). The replication origin, designated oriS14, maps within a 1.6- to 2.0-kbp region of RPS14 that includes the gene's third and fourth introns, exons IV plus V, and approximately 500 bp of proximal downstream flanking DNA. The nucleic acid sequence encoding oriS14 closely resembles the other mammalian chromosomal replication origins whose primary structures are known. It contains DNA binding sites for a large number of transcription factors, replication proteins, and mammalian oncogenes as well as several dinucleotide repeat motifs, an AT-rich region, and a sequence that is likely to bend the DNA. In contrast to the other well-characterized mammalian replication origins, which are autosomal and therefore carried as two copies per somatic cell, oriS14 is encoded by single-copy DNA within a hemizygous segment of chromosome 2q in CHO-K1 cells. Also, other known mammalian replication origins are situated in nontranscribed, intergenic DNA, whereas the DNA sequence encoding oriS14 substantially overlaps the transcribed portion of a constitutively expressed housekeeping gene.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenesAnimalsBase SequenceCHO CellsCricetinaeDNA PrimersMethylationMolecular Sequence DataRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidRibosomal ProteinsDNA PrimersRibosomal Proteinsribosomal protein S14

Identifiers

PMID8065299
PMCPMC359087
OpenAlexW1991746566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.