Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8063934›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1994

Observer variation in the histopathological classification of thymoma: correlation with prognosis.

A Dawson, N B Ibrahim, A R Gibbs

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The impact of thymoma histotype on prognosis in a worldwide database.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2015
    Article
  3. [A review of prognostic factors in thymic malignancies].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Invasive thymoma metastatic to the cavernous sinus.Surgical neurology international · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Thymoma: a review of the clinical and pathological findings in 65 cases.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A DawsonDepartment of Histopathology, Llandough Hospital, Cardiff.
N B Ibrahim
A R Gibbs

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess the ability of three histopathologists, experienced in thoracic surgical reporting, consistently to classify thymomas as cortical, medullary, or mixed pattern tumours.

methodsThree histopathologists classified 74 thymomas (none frank carcinomas) as of either cortical, medullary, or mixed pattern, on two separate occasions. Kappa statistics were used to assess inter- and intra-observer agreement. Tumour type was compared with surgical stage as a predictor of biological behaviour.

resultsInter- and intra-observer agreement were only moderate (kappa 0.48 and 0.52, respectively). For only 26 of 74 tumours could a categorisation be consistently agreed on. Follow up information was obtained for 73 cases, with a mean follow up period of five years. The prognoses for those 26 of 74 cases appeared to be at variance from previously reported studies, and showed internal inconsistency, with the mixed pattern category showing a worse survival than the cortical category. For the group as a whole, however, stage at presentation was related to survival, with an overall five year survival of 78% (100% for stage I, 84% for stage II, 27% for stage III and 0% for stage IV).

conclusionsThe classification of thymomas into cortical, medullary, or mixed pattern tumours is difficult to apply. Surgical stage remains a better guide to prognosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingObserver VariationPathologyPrognosisThymomaThymus Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID8063934
PMCPMC494738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.