ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994
Insertion mutagenesis as a tool to predict the secondary structure of a muscarinic receptor domain determining specificity of G-protein coupling.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structures of the M1 and M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor/G-protein complexes.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Structural features of heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors and their modulatory proteins.Molecular neurobiology · 1999Review
- Molecular Architecture of G Protein-Coupled Receptors.Drug development research · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The N-terminal segment of the third intracellular loop (i3) of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and other G protein-coupled receptors has been shown to largely determine the G-protein coupling selectivity displayed by a given receptor subtype. Based on secondary-structure prediction algorithms, we have tested the hypothesis that this region adopts an alpha-helical secondary structure. Using the rat m3 muscarinic receptor as a model system, a series of five mutant receptors, m3(+1A) to m3(+5A) were created in which one to five additional alanine residues were inserted between the end of the fifth transmembrane domain and the beginning of i3. We speculated that this manipulation should lead to a rotation of the N-terminal segment of the i3 domain (if it is in fact alpha-helically arranged), thus producing pronounced effects on receptor/G protein coupling. Pharmacological analysis of the various mutant receptors expressed in COS-7 cells showed that m3(+1A), m3(+3A), and m3(+4A) retained strong functional activity, whereas m3(+2A) and m3(+5A) proved to be virtually inactive. Helical wheel models show that this pattern is fully consistent with the notion that the N-terminal portion of i3 forms an amphiphilic alpha-helix and that the hydrophobic side of this helix represents the G-protein recognition surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.