Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8058474›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1994

Role of the macula densa in the control of renal renin gene expression in two-kidney/one-clip rats.

K Schricker, M Hamann, B Kaissling, A Kurtz

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K SchrickerPhysiologisches Institut der Universität Regensburg, Germany.
M Hamann
B Kaissling
A Kurtz
University of Regensburg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to examine whether macula densa function is involved in the changes of renal renin gene expression upon acute hypoperfusion of one kidney. To block macula densa function, rats with free access to salt and water were subcutaneously infused with furosemide (12 mg/day) for 6 days. Then, 4 days after the start of the infusion, the left renal arteries were clipped with 0.2-mm silver clips and renin mRNA levels in ipsilateral and contralateral kidneys, as well as plasma renin activities (PRA), were determined 48 h after clipping. In non-clipped animals furosemide increased PRA from 10 to 47 ng angiotensin I.h-1.ml-1 and raised renin mRNA levels in both kidneys 2.5-fold. In vehicle-infused animals, clipping of the left renal artery increased PRA to 37 ng angiotensin I.h-1.ml-1 and led to a 5-fold rise of renin mRNA levels in the ipsilateral kidneys and to a suppression to 20% of the control values in the contralateral kidneys. PRA values in clipped and furosemide-infused animals were 45 ng angiotensin I.h-1.ml-1. In these animals renin mRNA levels increased in the ipsilateral kidneys to similar absolute values as in vehicle-infused rats, whilst contralateral renin mRNA levels fell to about 25% of the respective controls. These findings indicate that the stimulations of renin gene expression by inhibition of macula densa salt transport and by renal artery clipping are not additive, suggesting that the macula densa mechanism may participate in the stimulation of renin gene expression upon hypoperfusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionRenal CirculationActinsAnimalsFurosemideIschemiaKidneyMaleRatsRats, WistarReninRNA, MessengerActinsFurosemideReninRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID8058474
OpenAlexW2140010912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.