ArticleDiabetologia1994
Combined analysis of islet cell antibodies which cross-react with mouse pancreas, antibodies to the M(r) 64,000 islet protein, and antibodies to glutamate decarboxylase in subjects at risk for IDDM.
Article in Diabetologia, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With regard to progression to diabetes, ICA cross-reactive with mouse pancreas, antibodies to the M(r) 64,000 islet antigen (64K), antibodies immunotrapping brain GAD activity, and IAA were analysed in 53 ICA-positive first-degree relatives of IDDM patients and 18 ICA-positive schoolchildren without a family history of diabetes. Sera from 29 (55%) relatives did not bind to mouse pancreas, whereas 24 (45%) displayed cross-species reaction. ICA titres on human and mouse pancreas were weakly correlated in the overall population (p < 0.05) but more strongly (p < 0.01) in only those subjects who displayed antibodies on tissues from both species. GAD and 64K antibodies were detected in 31% and 35% of relatives. In schoolchildren, the frequencies of cross-species reactive ICA (22%), GAD antibodies (6%), 64K antibodies (22%), and IAA (6%), were lower (p < 0.05) than in relatives. A strong correlation (p < 0.0001) was observed between GAD and 64K antibodies. GAD or 64K antibodies were strongly correlated with ICA on human pancreas (p < 0.0001) but poorly with ICA on mouse pancreas (p = 0.05). After pre-incubation of sera with brain homogenate, ICA titres were unaffected on mouse pancreas but reduced on human pancreas. ICA-positive subjects who displayed neither cross-species reactive ICA nor GAD or 64K antibodies were more frequent (p < 0.05) among schoolchildren than relatives, whereas subjects who displayed all antibody specificities were more numerous (p < 0.04) in relatives. All relatives with ICA binding only to human pancreas, as well as all schoolchildren, permanently displayed an AIRG higher than the first control percentile and remained non-diabetic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.