Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8052533›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1994

Probing the conformational changes in 5.8S, 18S and 28S rRNA upon association of derived subunits into complete 80S ribosomes.

L Holmberg, Y Melander, O Nygård

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L HolmbergDepartment of Zoological Cell Biology, Arrhenius Laboratories E5, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Y Melander
O Nygård
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The participation of 18S, 5.8S and 28S ribosomal RNA in subunit association was investigated by chemical modification and primer extension. Derived 40S and 60S ribosomal subunits isolated from mouse Ehrlich ascites cells were reassociated into 80S particles. These ribosomes were treated with dimethyl sulphate and 1-cyclohexyl-3-(morpholinoethyl) carbodiimide metho-p-toluene sulfonate to allow specific modification of single strand bases in the rRNAs. The modification pattern in the 80S ribosome was compared to that of the derived ribosomal subunits. Formation of complete 80S ribosomes altered the extent of modification of a limited number of bases in the rRNAs. The majority of these nucleotides were located to phylogenetically conserved regions in the rRNA but the reactivity of some bases in eukaryote specific sequences was also changed. The nucleotides affected by subunit association were clustered in the central and 3'-minor domains of 18S rRNA as well as in domains I, II, IV and V of 5.8/28S rRNA. Most of the bases became less accessible to modification in the 80S ribosome, suggesting that these bases were involved in subunit interaction. Three regions of the rRNAs, the central domain of 18S rRNA, 5.8S rRNA and domain V in 28S rRNA, contained bases that showed increased accessibility for modification after subunit association. The increased reactivity indicates that these regions undergo structural changes upon subunit association.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationAnimalsBase SequenceCarcinoma, Ehrlich TumorEscherichia coliMiceModels, StructuralMolecular Sequence DataRibosomesRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 28SRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 28SRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S

Identifiers

PMID8052533
PMCPMC308247
OpenAlexW1974211546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.